Dee-Nee Forums

General => RBI Baseball => Topic started by: erhajj on 01/06/06, 08:13:13 PM

Title: new glitch?
Post by: erhajj on 01/06/06, 08:13:13 PM
By the way, I think that I discovered a new glitch.  I won in the bottom half of the inning on a walk off homer and the final score became 4-2.  But when the game went to its end game screen the score was shown as 3-2.  The homer counted but not the additional run.  hmmmm....
Title: Re: new glitch?
Post by: JoeDirt on 01/06/06, 09:35:06 PM
Yeah, it always does it that way with walk offs...
Title: Re: new glitch?
Post by: nomaaa on 01/07/06, 12:12:14 AM
didn't some guy from the mets, third baseman, i forget his name...
anyway, didn't he hit a grandslam double in the nlcs the year they lost to the yankees?
Title: Re: new glitch?
Post by: JoeDirt on 01/07/06, 12:20:03 AM
Ventura?
Title: Re: new glitch?
Post by: fknmclane on 01/07/06, 12:47:30 AM
Yes, Satan?
Title: Re: new glitch?
Post by: fightonusc on 01/07/06, 12:51:03 AM
In "real" baseball, all runs count in a walk-off HR. In RBI Baseball, they stop counting after the winning run crosses the plate.
Title: Re: new glitch?
Post by: BeeJay on 01/07/06, 01:18:39 AM
Quote from: fknmclane on 01/07/06, 12:47:30 AM
Yes, Satan?

:POW:
Title: Re: new glitch?
Post by: Attezz on 01/07/06, 01:26:37 AM
What the hell are you guys talking about?
Title: Re: new glitch?
Post by: ultimate7 on 01/07/06, 11:04:09 AM
If the runner is fast enough some times he will score on a walk off, but if the winning run is on 2nd or 3rd, generally the hitter doesn't score before the game "ends"
Title: Re: new glitch?
Post by: erhajj on 01/07/06, 06:44:27 PM
Quote from: nomaaa on 01/07/06, 12:12:14 AM
didn't some guy from the mets, third baseman, i forget his name...
anyway, didn't he hit a grandslam double in the nlcs the year they lost to the yankees?
It was Ventura in 99 but that was because he didn't acually run all the way around the bases.

Before 1920 the major leagues used to have a rule such as this and babe ruth actually lost 4 or 5 homers career because of this rule.
Title: Re: new glitch?
Post by: fknmclane on 01/07/06, 08:47:48 PM
Thanks Beej.
Title: Re: new glitch?
Post by: TβG on 02/20/06, 01:32:34 PM
this glitch may not be new... but i was just playing with california vs boston and fielded a grounball that the umpire ruled foul.  then when i fielded it i got a bop.  it charged an error for a foul ball grounder.  i hope this doesn't ruin my chance at a perfect game now.
Title: Re: new glitch?
Post by: BeefMaster on 02/20/06, 01:39:14 PM
Quote from: Teddyballgame on 02/20/06, 01:32:34 PM
this glitch may not be new... but i was just playing with california vs boston and fielded a grounball that the umpire ruled foul.  then when i fielded it i got a bop.  it charged an error for a foul ball grounder.  i hope this doesn't ruin my chance at a perfect game now.

In an actual MLB game, does it count as a perfect game if the pitcher's team commits an error that doesn't result in allowing a runner on base, like dropping a foul popup?  I say yes, since the pitcher still retires all 27 batters, but I've heard it defined as "No runs, walks/HBPs, or errors", rather than "27 up, 27 down".
Title: Re: new glitch?
Post by: Shooty on 02/20/06, 01:53:45 PM
Quote from: BeefMaster on 02/20/06, 01:39:14 PM
Quote from: Teddyballgame on 02/20/06, 01:32:34 PM
this glitch may not be new... but i was just playing with california vs boston and fielded a grounball that the umpire ruled foul.  then when i fielded it i got a bop.  it charged an error for a foul ball grounder.  i hope this doesn't ruin my chance at a perfect game now.

In an actual MLB game, does it count as a perfect game if the pitcher's team commits an error that doesn't result in allowing a runner on base, like dropping a foul popup?  I say yes, since the pitcher still retires all 27 batters, but I've heard it defined as "No runs, walks/HBPs, or errors", rather than "27 up, 27 down".

Yes, but this wouldn't be considered an error in real baseball.  It was a foul groundball.
Title: Re: new glitch?
Post by: BeefMaster on 02/20/06, 02:00:03 PM
Quote from: Shooty Babitt on 02/20/06, 01:53:45 PM
Quote from: BeefMaster on 02/20/06, 01:39:14 PM
Quote from: Teddyballgame on 02/20/06, 01:32:34 PM
this glitch may not be new... but i was just playing with california vs boston and fielded a grounball that the umpire ruled foul.  then when i fielded it i got a bop.  it charged an error for a foul ball grounder.  i hope this doesn't ruin my chance at a perfect game now.

In an actual MLB game, does it count as a perfect game if the pitcher's team commits an error that doesn't result in allowing a runner on base, like dropping a foul popup?  I say yes, since the pitcher still retires all 27 batters, but I've heard it defined as "No runs, walks/HBPs, or errors", rather than "27 up, 27 down".

Yes, but this wouldn't be considered an error in real baseball.  It was a foul groundball.

I know... I just was wondering what would happen in my hypothetical situation, since it's similar.
Title: Re: new glitch?
Post by: Mr. Blubbo on 02/20/06, 04:05:29 PM
A perfect game is a game in which there are zero base runners for any reason.  If there is a man on base, then it isn't a perfect game.  Retiring the minimum doesn't equal a perfect case in every scenario.

In your scenario with the dropped foul ball, it doesn't count as an error so I don't see how it would be a perfect game, if that batter got on base on the very next pitch.
Title: Re: new glitch?
Post by: BeefMaster on 02/20/06, 04:14:04 PM
Quote from: Racktacular on 02/20/06, 04:05:29 PM
A perfect game is a game in which there are zero base runners for any reason.  If there is a man on base, then it isn't a perfect game.  Retiring the minimum doesn't equal a perfect case in every scenario.

In your scenario with the dropped foul ball, it doesn't count as an error so I don't see how it would be a perfect game, if that batter got on base on the very next pitch.

I realized after I posted that "27 up, 27 down" could be misinterpreted as you did - I meant that no baserunner reaches base, and that the "27 down" occurred one at a time, in each at-bat.  Even that probably should've been clarified for the case in which a batter gets a hit but is caught trying to get an extra base.

I'm referring to a dropped foul popup, which does indeed count as an error, because it causes an out not to be made (I'll check the official rules to be sure, but I'm pretty sure I've seen it in a game before).  My scenario, though, involved the foul popup being dropped but the batter getting out on a subsequent pitch.  I would think that would still be considered a perfect game, even though the pitcher's team committed an error.
Title: Re: new glitch?
Post by: BeefMaster on 02/20/06, 04:17:03 PM
Rule 10.13(a): "An error shall be charged against any fielder when he muffs a foul fly, to prolong the time at bat of a batter whether the batter subsequently reaches first base or is put out." (http://mlb.mlb.com/NASApp/mlb/mlb/official_info/official_rules/official_scorer_10.jsp)
Title: Re: new glitch?
Post by: Shooty on 02/20/06, 05:08:33 PM
Muffs
Title: Re: new glitch?
Post by: ultimate7 on 02/21/06, 09:14:02 AM
It is an error and it would still be a perfect game

Quote from: Racktacular on 02/20/06, 04:05:29 PM

In your scenario with the dropped foul ball, it doesn't count as an error

Thanks again stating something as a fact, when it is not