Dee-Nee Forums

General => RBI Baseball => Topic started by: ultimate7 on 02/09/12, 05:48:01 PM

Title: Brett sued
Post by: ultimate7 on 02/09/12, 05:48:01 PM
http://www.kansascity.com/2012/02/07/3416171/company-led-by-brett-sued-over.html (http://www.kansascity.com/2012/02/07/3416171/company-led-by-brett-sued-over.html)
Title: Re: Brett sued
Post by: fathedX on 02/09/12, 07:36:11 PM
I needed a new bat for this season and was happy with my Brett Bros. bat that I used last year, so I went to their website this week.  It used to be the bats were on the front page, but now it was all this dumb jewelry.  It's a huge industry and I'm sure the profit margins are way better than the saturated bat market, so I understand it.  My son has bought a couple of similar necklaces at Dick's in the past and he wears them often.  I don't think he believes in all the claims made, but they sure were overpriced for what they are.
Title: Re: Brett sued
Post by: TβG on 02/09/12, 09:20:20 PM
that stuff has to be a sham, most times players aren't even wearing the necklaces against the skin. even if the "magic crystals" power did work.
Title: Re: Brett sued
Post by: ryno on 02/09/12, 10:41:06 PM
the boy has a couple of these necklaces. . . . they look good. . ..no magic powers, however.
Title: Re: Brett sued
Post by: TβG on 02/10/12, 12:10:30 AM
i think it's terrible in general that necklaces or any type of jewelry has any place on an athletic field.

it's probably on account of i'm so manly.
Title: Re: Brett sued
Post by: Stock on 02/10/12, 10:57:33 AM
How stupid if Brett Bros has to give back $5Million to buyers.
I see these necklaces as a stupid tax for anyone that thinks they are going to get special powers from wearing one.
Title: Re: Brett sued
Post by: fathedX on 02/10/12, 11:21:06 AM
I think it's more a referendum on making false claims.
Title: Re: Brett sued
Post by: Brookensrules! on 02/10/12, 11:50:45 AM
Quote from: TβG on 02/10/12, 12:10:30 AM
i think it's terrible in general that necklaces or any type of jewelry has any place on an athletic field.

it's probably on account of i'm so manly.
I agree, I too am manly as well.
Title: Re: Brett sued
Post by: Gantry on 02/10/12, 02:55:33 PM
This is just plain weird...
Title: Re: Brett sued
Post by: TβG on 02/10/12, 11:07:26 PM
double-blind study or gtfo
Title: Re: Brett sued
Post by: fknmclane on 02/15/12, 09:10:39 PM
When's the last time you shit your pants?
Title: Re: Brett sued
Post by: bonny on 02/16/12, 03:50:44 PM
double tapered