Print Page - Tim Laudner

Title: Tim Laudner
Post by: GDavis on 11/13/02, 09:28:05 AM

Tim Laudner is a stud.

Title: Re:Tim Laudner
Post by: Big Hath on 11/13/02, 02:05:06 PM

For me, Laudner and Gedman are the same player.

Title: Re:Tim Laudner
Post by: Gantry on 11/13/02, 02:22:45 PM

I think all right-handed 7-hitters are programmed to be streay - Gedman, Schofield, Laudner, Ray Knight are all very hit-or-miss. One game they rule, the next game it's all double plays...

Title: Re:Tim Laudner
Post by: NotURMasButArmas on 11/13/02, 04:50:10 PM

Good call Gantry. I was thinking to myself the other day how it seems (to me) that the odd numbered players in the order (1,3,5,7...minus the #9 pitcher) are usually better hitters then the 2,4,6,8 slots, baring no subs. Anyone agree or disagree?

Armas

Title: Re:Tim Laudner
Post by: GPines on 11/13/02, 05:16:57 PM

I'm afraid that asumption is very wrong, Kirk Gibson #2, J. Rice #4, Reggie Jackson #4, Hrbek #4...??

Title: Re:Tim Laudner
Post by: B on 11/16/02, 10:40:13 AM

Brookens 8?

Title: Re: Tim Laudner
Post by: TempoGL on 05/18/07, 07:54:35 AM

Owen 8?

Title: Re: Tim Laudner
Post by: ultimate7 on 05/18/07, 08:54:34 AM

Quote from: Gantry on 11/13/02, 02:22:45 PM
I think all right-handed 7-hitters are programmed to be streay - Gedman, Schofield, Laudner, Ray Knight are all very hit-or-miss. One game they rule, the next game it's all double plays...

Nightwulf doesn't like your (old) tone

Title: Re: Tim Laudner
Post by: venomousmule on 05/25/07, 12:04:45 PM

For some reason, Harold Baines is the worst for me. (#6)

Dee-Nee Forums

General => RBI Baseball => Topic started by: GDavis on 11/13/02, 09:28:05 AM