If anybody is up to the task of creating an "all-time rosters" rom, I have a link that would help out greatly.
I can't say that they are right on the money, but Its a start. It has the "All-time rosters" of every team. So I would suggest using my 3 roms, which have all the teams allready set, and plug the lineups in, or I could even do that, and i believe they have stats, you will probably have to use your stats to get rankings system, and they should all be there.
Anyway, here's the link:
http://sports.espn.go.com/chat/sportsnation/neyer/story?page=Neyer-030606
I'm going to try an alltime set, but I'm using the stats from here: http://www.geocities.com/patthebone/DiamondMind/MLB_Team_Rosters.htm
It has a larger base to choose from. Although for myself, this will take some time because I'm anal, and I want no player duplications. Which makes deciding where guys like Foxx, McGwire, Frank Robinson, Staub, etc quite a pain. Eh, maybe I'll just make a 10 team AL and 10 team NL rom. Otherwise Crimedog is first base on 4 or 5 teams. Stupid expansion teams, they complicate everything.
Hey, Clyon. I think it would probably be best not to use your ROMs - not because they're not good (far from it; they're about the best thing since sliced bread), but because the game would be unbalanced. The Yankees and D-Backs are both in ROM 1, for example, and 100 years of history vs. 5 isn't quite fair. Also, the Tigers are in ROM 3, and while they stink now, Ty Cob and Hank Greenberg will have a field day with Wade Boggs and the Devil Rays.
I made an all-time ROM about a year ago with the original RBI teams (I didn't have any method to edit the team names), and it was basically unplayable without dividing the teams into pre- and post-expansion era. I'll have to see if I can find that and get it up on Gantry's ROMs page - it's pretty decent if you stick to my guidelines.
I'd be interested in helping out. My best asset would probably be making sure the ratings are within the original levels. I'd imagine you'd want to be close to the arcade ratings, rather than the original rom, since the arcade rom has the all time greats as well. Since it's your rom(s), I'll leave that decision up to you.
I can also help with my knowledge of baseball. So if you're trying to figure out which year to use for which player, or who should be in the starting lineup, I can help there too.
Just some notes:
Those articles with the all time teams won't give you many of the best players of all times. It's just a sampler from Neyer's new book. For example the Braves doesn't have guys from when they played in Boston or Milwaukee (no Eddie Mathews IIRC!!!). So I agree with using the diamond mind site for the teams.
I agree with both points in replies. I like the idea of one player on each team, without repeats, and I like the idea of having the oldest teams on one rom, down to the youngest teams on another.
I also would want to add that you should have the best player at each position on each team. For example, each team should have a catcher, SS, 3B, etc., even though you may just sub them out later anyway.
Let me know how I can help.
Mike
Hey Northsiders, I would imagine this rom would really appeal to you! Imagine adding
Sosa 64HRs
to
Wilson 54HRs
Dawson 49HRs
Banks 47HRs
Sandberg 40HRs
Hartnett 37HRs
B.Williams 42HRs
Santo 30 HRs
That seems a bit sick to me!
Mike
Any thoughts as to which teams make the first group of 10? There are 16 original teams ("original" meaning they were around in '03, when the first World Series took place), which leaves 6 teams to migrate to the second ROM with the early expansion teams (Mets, Rangers/Senators II, etc.). My thought would be to leave 9 of the teams from the arcade ROM and sent Houston to ROM 2 for Detroit. Ty Cobb, Denny McLain... they probably can't hang with the Yanks, but not many teams can.
The other options would be the Twins/Senators, Orioles/Browns, Pirates, Phillies, Indians, and White Sox. The Senators had very few good years before moving to Minnesota, the Browns were consistently a laughingstock, the Phillies were mediocre for a long time, and the Sox have been about as successful as the Cubs, only with fewer great players. The Indians haven't been much better than the Phillies. The Pirates are probably the best bet (Honus Wagner, Willie Stargell), but I don't know who they should replace. Maybe the Reds, but the Big Red Machine of the 70's probably has enough oomph to hold them off.
Real quick, looking over that diamond mind page I found the best teams to probably be:
YANKS
GIANTS
DODGERS
CUBS
RED SOX
As
BRAVES
That's 7 teams, which leaves us with 3. The next level seems to be:
Reds, Tigers, Cards, Pirates and Indians.
So we have to eliminate 2. If you put Bonds on the Giants, the Pirates unfortunately look to be out. If you put McGwire on STL (and you wouldn't hurt OAK by doing it sice the have double X), then STL would probably be a keeper.
So adding the cards & removing the Pirates, you have to pick 2 from:
Reds, Tigers, and Indians.
I think before we dismiss one, someone should post potential lineups (with 4 subs), so we can really see who has an advantage.
Mike
Oh yeah, I forgot, they do post a Negro League team. Even though the stats look woefull, you have to remember they really didn't keep stats for that league. It could be a good idea to maybe save a spot on rom 1 for them. I mean, 50 years of black players have to make up a pretty sick team. Also if you're interested I know enough about Japanese baseball to make a Japanese all time team.
Just throwing out ideas.
Mike
i just feel like the tigers have earned it, if not for their success and dominance in RBI, but because of such great players like cobb, kaline...the pitchers...and the master of all ceremonies....cecil fielder
ps...if brookens doenst make the all time team...i boycott...everything....somehow
I finally found my All-Time RBI ROM - I've got rosters for the Cards and Tigers. Here's what I had:
Detroit:
Cobb .405 9
Heilman .403 18
Trammel .343 28
Greenberg .315 58
Kaline .327 27
Parrish .284 32
Gehringer .371 14
Kell .340 8
Gibson .287 29
Fielder .277 51
Cash .361 41
Horton .285 36
Note: I allowed more than two starters per team; I don't think there are any relievers
Morris 3.01
McLain 1.96
Trout 2.12
Lolich 2.50
St. Louis:
Brock .299 21
Medwick .374 31
Hornsby .401 42 (the only 40-.400 season ever!)
McGwire .299 70
Musial .376 39
Torre .363 24
Simmons .332 18
Smith .303 0
Bottomley .367 21
Slaughter .300 18
Mize .314 43
Frisch .346 10
Gibson 1.12
D. Dean 2.66
P. Dean 3.37 (He's a bad choice, but I was struggling for pitchers)
Worrell 2.08
I had ratings for all the players, but this was done when I thought there was a groundball attribute and no directional curve. Sorry, bban, but I don't know where the heck I would fit Tom Brookens in that Detroit lineup.
Well I can post Cleveland's team:
Alomar .336 20
Thome .304 52
Lojie .376 6
Boudreau .355 18
Rosen .336 43
Belle .317 50
COlavito .303 41
Speaker .380 17
Bench
Trosky .343 42
Keltner .297 31
Lofton .349 12
Averill .378 28
DOby .326 25
Jacoby .300 32
SHoeless Joe .408 7 ???
Pitchers
Feller 2.18 (Rapid Robert has Nolan Ryan type fastball)
Joss 1.16
Mesa 1.13
Plenty more guys - but these are the top 3, by far.
So we still have to choose two of this team, Detroit, or Cincy.
Mike
Here is my vote for an all time rom. I take it that the format is going to be 10 NL and AL. In picking these 20 teams I feel that you have to consider two factors, history and market. Obviously history is important becuase it includeds such a huge volume of players and market is important because it includes a huge volume of fans (more fans = more rom popularity. Here are my choices in no particular order. The teams with a * next to them should be included without question.
NL
1. Giants *
2. St. Louis*
3. Los Angels*
4. Chicago cubs*
5. Pittsburg*
6. Atlanta*
7. Philadelphia*
8. Cinnicnatti*
9. NY Mets
10. Houston/Montreal/San Diego
AL.
1. NY Yankees*
2. Boston*
3. Cleveland*
4. Baltimore*
5. Detroit*
6. Oakland*
7. Chicago White sox*
8. Kanas City
9. Minnesota
10. Texas/(washington)
Here is my all time Giants team. THESE ALL-TIME STATS CAN ONLY INCLUDE A SEASON IN WHICH THEY PLAYED FOR THE RESPECTIVE TEAM!!!!
1b Mcovey .320 45
2nd Kent .334 33
SS Aurilla .324 37
3rd Williams .294 38
OF BA.Bonds .328 73
OF Mays .317 52
OF Ott .328 42
C Santiago .278 16
B1 Terry .401 23
B2 Clark .308 35
B3 Cepeda .311 46
B4 BO.Bonds .283 39
S1 Marical 2.10
S2 Matthewson 1.14
R1 Nen 1.50
R2 Beck 1.76
HOLY CRAP!!! Is there a better team than the Giants???
Gotta get Mel Ott, Will Clark and Bill Terry on there somewhere...
its coming along..i'm doing it in sections
I'll post the All time Phillies team. One minute.
How about an All-Fat Team. We'll have to move a bunch of first basemen to other positions, but at least the RBI players will finally look realistic.
players:
Mo Vaughn
Steve Balboni
Babe Ruth
David Wells
Rich Garces
to name a few. Lets hear some more names!
.I don't think I'll put guys from like the 20's. Anyway, here's my list.
SB
C Darren Daulton L 1992 .270 27 109 11
1B Pete Rose B 1979 .331 4 59 20
2B Manny Trillo R 1980 .292 7 43 8
3B Mike Schmidt R 1980 .286 48 121 12
SS Larry Bowa B 1978 .294 3 43 27
CF Lenny Dykstra L 1993 .305 19 66 37
LF Greg Luzinski R 1977 .309 39 130 3
RF Bobby Abreau L 2001 .289 31 110 36
SP Steve Carlton L 1972 1.97 27-10 310
SP Curt Schilling R 1997 2.97 17-11 319
RP Kent Tekulve R 1986 2.54 11-5 57
(I just wanted a sidearmer)
RP Steve Bedrosian R 1987 2.83 40sv 74k
BP Dick Allen R 1966 .317 40 110 10
BP Von Hayes L 1986 .305 19 98 24
BP Pete Incaviglia R 1993 .274 24 89 1
BP Greg Gross L 1984 .322 0 16 1
(you have to have one RBI style bench hitter)
my man beef....
you could at least put him as a pinch hitter or possibly the new team mascot....he needs to be a part of the team...make him a bench coach...his presence alone puts the tigers at an advantage over any team...
I'm gonna say we go with the Tigers and Indians along with the 8 previously selected teams (Yanks, Dodgers, Giants, Cards, Cubs, BoSox, A's, Braves). The Reds can be the powerhouse of ROM 2 (Senators/Twins, Browns/Orioles, White Sox, Pirates, Phillies, then a few of the early 60's expansion teams, like the Mets and Senators/Rangers).
I'm going to try doing some plugging on ROM 1. It oughta be interesting...
Hey, sucka free, I was just comparing your all-time Giants team to the all-time Giants team I put together on a ROM last summer, and they almost exactly matched. The only differences were that I didn't use relief pitchers (even then, my top two starters matched yours) and that we had two different position players - I picked Alvin Dark instead of Rich Aurilia at SS (in retrospect, your choice was better; I underestimated how long he'd played for the Giants and DQ'd him because of that), and I had Bob Brenly instead of Benito Santiago at C (Brenly was with the Giants longer and had better peak stats). It's as if we had a Vulcan mind-meld, only several months apart.
A vulcan mind meld. NICE! Brenly might be a better pick, however from a skills point of view, santiago is a superior catcher and I much bigger threat at the plate. PLus he speaks spanish which is a huge plus since the influx of the latin explosion. Santiago is still in the top 5 catchers in the league today at age 38. Still, I can't argue with someone picking brenly from a giants perspective. Glad too know that there is another giants guru out there.