Dee-Nee Forums

General => RBI Baseball => Topic started by: RedBarron on 05/13/05, 02:45:36 PM

Title: MLB'ers you assumed were RBI'ers but weren't
Post by: RedBarron on 05/13/05, 02:45:36 PM
So who in MLB did you assume was on RBI but was not?

Maybe it's  guys who should have been on the game but were left off.


I throw Kevin McReynolds in the mix. 

The game came out in '88 and McReynolds was in his 2nd sucessfull season with the mets.
Title: Re: MLB'ers you assumed were RBI'ers but weren't
Post by: Stock on 05/13/05, 02:50:57 PM
Greenwell
Title: Re: MLB'ers you assumed were RBI'ers but weren't
Post by: BDawk on 05/13/05, 02:53:22 PM
Rickey Henderson seems like he should be in RBI
Title: Re: MLB'ers you assumed were RBI'ers but weren't
Post by: ultimate7 on 05/13/05, 02:56:53 PM
Again Steve Henderson, just because I always confused him and Dave.


Another good one would be Tim Burke
Title: Re: MLB'ers you assumed were RBI'ers but weren't
Post by: Stock on 05/13/05, 02:58:54 PM
When I first got this game, my mom bought it off a shopping network for me.
They advertised that the game had all the baseball teams and players on it.  When my mom called to order the game, I had her ask if Robin Yount was on the game (he was my favorite player back in the day).  
The chick said, "Yes, the game has all the players".
Stupid cunt.
Anyway, I didn't stay angry for long, but always wished Yount was on the game.
Title: Re: MLB'ers you assumed were RBI'ers but weren't
Post by: BDawk on 05/13/05, 03:00:35 PM
Quote from: ultimate7 on 05/13/05, 02:56:53 PM
Another good one would be Tim Burke

or Ellis Burke
Title: Re: MLB'ers you assumed were RBI'ers but weren't
Post by: TβG on 05/13/05, 04:16:45 PM
hubie brooks and harold reynolds got hosed.  they should have been onthe All-star teams.
Title: Re: MLB'ers you assumed were RBI'ers but weren't
Post by: ultimate7 on 05/13/05, 04:28:27 PM
We always mention Hubie Brooks being robbed by Pedrique.  But what about Terry Kennedy (all-star Catcher) who was robbed by Schroeder.
Title: Re: MLB'ers you assumed were RBI'ers but weren't
Post by: TβG on 05/13/05, 04:35:26 PM
i think the brooks and reynolds debate holds more water than kennedy, although kennedy was an actual all-star. 

kennedy     12 HR's    .250 in over 500 ab's
schroeder   14 HR's    .332 in half as many

i don't think i'd argue too much about that selection, but really i wouldn't care who the AL catcher was.  he would be subbed.
Title: Re: MLB'ers you assumed were RBI'ers but weren't
Post by: ultimate7 on 05/13/05, 08:26:18 PM
I thought Kennedy hit 18 HRs, but I could be wrong.  In any case I'm pretty sure Schroder only started about 50 games as a Catcher in '87.