Dee-Nee Forums

General => RBI Baseball => Topic started by: TommyD (MrOJ) on 05/26/05, 03:19:47 PM

Poll
Question: What kind of lineup would you preffer for RBI?
Option 1: Two or three superstars with average-below supporting. votes: 4
Option 2: Eight players all above average, but nothing great. votes: 6
Title: Superstars or Role Players
Post by: TommyD (MrOJ) on 05/26/05, 03:19:47 PM
I'd definately choose the two superstars.. in RBI Baseball, superstars can take you a long way, like hit 3 HRs each in a game, producing 7-8 runs ;)
Title: Re: Superstars or Role Players
Post by: ultimate7 on 05/26/05, 03:26:39 PM
This is a good question, probably should be in the RBI forum, for me it really depends on what kind of average guy you are talking about.

Having 3 Eric Davis's in your lineup though is pretty tough to argue against
Title: Re: Superstars or Role Players
Post by: Stock on 05/26/05, 03:30:33 PM
I went with consistency.  Yes, a couple superstars are nice since they can get that need bomb, but I think having several holes in your line-up is even worse.
This is my biggest problem w/ NY.  I would consider Herndz thru Straw to be "2-3" superstars, but they have too many holes in their line-up to make them a great team.
If I were playing against someone, I would rather only have 2-3 studs to face (or pitch around), and then not have to worry about the next 6 spots. This is much better than pitching to a team of just above average guys (say Pucket).
Title: Re: Superstars or Role Players
Post by: JoeDirt on 05/26/05, 03:32:39 PM
I agree with stock and submit Min as another example of why consistency throughout the line up is better than a few studs.  It's just too easy to pitch around the studs and make the weak hitters beat you.
Title: Re: Superstars or Role Players
Post by: ultimate7 on 05/26/05, 03:56:08 PM
This is why you have to define average.  If you are saying that Kevin Mitchell is average, yes I'd prefer a lineup of Mitchells to 3 EDs and 5 Gladdens.
Title: Re: Superstars or Role Players
Post by: Stock on 05/26/05, 04:08:48 PM
Quote from: ultimate7 on 05/26/05, 03:56:08 PM
This is why you have to define average.  If you are saying that Kevin Mitchell is average, yes I'd prefer a lineup of Mitchells to 3 EDs and 5 Gladdens.

Right.  And he even said "above average".  I figured Pucket fit this description pretty well since I could think of 45-50 players better than him in the game.
Title: Re: Superstars or Role Players
Post by: MR RBI on 05/26/05, 07:08:02 PM
I love my New York Mets line-up. I find putting in Heep is a great move for me in the line-up Stock. How bout you? 
Title: Re: Superstars or Role Players
Post by: Stock on 05/26/05, 07:32:06 PM
Quote from: MR RBI on 05/26/05, 07:08:02 PM
I love my New York Mets line-up. I find putting in Heep is a great move for me in the line-up Stock. How bout you? 

Here is the line-up I usually use for NY:
Dykstr
Johnsn
Herndz
Carter
Strwby
Teufel
Knight
Heep
Title: Re: Superstars or Role Players
Post by: MR RBI on 05/26/05, 07:44:38 PM
No Wilson..Wow.You lose his speed and gain a bat.Nice move. I can't do that..I believe in hit and run.Hojo don't even hit the long ball.
Title: Re: Superstars or Role Players
Post by: Stock on 05/27/05, 07:53:34 AM
Quote from: MR RBI on 05/26/05, 07:44:38 PM
No Wilson..Wow.You lose his speed and gain a bat.Nice move. I can't do that..I believe in hit and run.Hojo don't even hit the long ball.

On a personal note, I think HoJo is better than Dykstra and Wilson, but I leave in Dykstra for his speed.  As for subbing out Wilson, Hojo has much more power (same as Brenly), and still has above average speed.  I just feel that HoJo AND Heep need to be in that order somewhere.
Title: Re: Superstars or Role Players
Post by: MR RBI on 05/27/05, 09:39:25 PM
Joe Dirt beat me with our Mets today 1-0. But i beat his Giants 1-0.......