Dee-Nee Forums

General => News => Topic started by: ultimate7 on 02/01/10, 04:14:52 PM

Title: Back to Back
Post by: ultimate7 on 02/01/10, 04:14:52 PM
Months with over 10,000 posts.  First time since Jan-Feb 2007
Title: Re: Back to Back
Post by: fathedX on 02/01/10, 04:15:23 PM
We are so awesome.
Title: Re: Back to Back
Post by: Gantry on 02/01/10, 04:16:43 PM
Is Dee-Nee back?
Title: Re: Back to Back
Post by: BDawk on 02/01/10, 04:19:30 PM
to back?
Title: Re: Back to Back
Post by: Reds on 02/01/10, 04:24:23 PM
no, but Jean Claude van Damme is on the Double Impact movie poster.

(http://ec1.images-amazon.com/images/P/B00004VYG1.01._SCLZZZZZZZ_V64968582_.jpg)
Title: Re: Back to Back
Post by: bigbrothermuscle on 02/02/10, 10:04:30 PM
Isn't Double Impact a straight film ripoff of Double Dragon?

Van Damme turned down a role to be in "The Expendables." That must be the stupidest thing ever this side of Larry Anderson for Jeff Bagwell.

"JCVD" is supposed to be an incredible movie from what I've heard. Check it out if you guys haven't seen it, as I will too.
Title: Re: Back to Back
Post by: Gantry on 02/02/10, 10:09:31 PM
Though I never saw Double Dragon, based on the game the plotlines are quite a bit different. 

I keep hearing good things about JCVD too, really need to see it.  I literally never go to the video store anymore, I should really give Netflix a shot already
Title: Re: Back to Back
Post by: bigbrothermuscle on 02/03/10, 02:37:39 PM
Lol @ Gantry.

Sorry dude, I meant the first video game for the NES back in 1988. I think Double Impact is a direct Video Game ripoff movie. Doesn't Van Damme play a pair of twins in that movie?

Say what you want about Van Damme's lame 90's career...Bloodsport and Kickboxer are incredible martial arts flicks.
Title: Re: Back to Back
Post by: Darky on 02/03/10, 05:27:49 PM
Kane and Malnu are going to approve of  bigbrothermuscle...

both flicks were lame btw...live with it newbie
Title: Re: Back to Back
Post by: Gantry on 02/03/10, 05:32:12 PM
Double Dragon is its own movie (based off the video game) with the dude from Party of Five.  Double Impact isn't based off a video game and doesn't have anything to do with Double Dragon. 

Title: Re: Back to Back
Post by: Darky on 02/03/10, 05:39:57 PM
You mean Double Dribble Gantry?
Title: Re: Back to Back
Post by: Gantry on 02/03/10, 05:43:20 PM
Well played...
Title: Re: Back to Back
Post by: bigbrothermuscle on 02/04/10, 02:37:26 PM
QuoteKane and Malnu are going to approve of  bigbrothermuscle...

both flicks were lame btw...live with it newbie

Thanks for the kind word.

Newbie? I've been following this site for over 2 years. It's only been recent I decided to finally join the boards and coerce with you fine people. Van Damme is a horrid actor, but he's a pretty awesome martial artist...a bit dated, but still awesome.
Title: Re: Back to Back
Post by: CenterSquare on 02/04/10, 07:04:38 PM
I know they call him the Muscles from Brussels, and I can see why. I had a nickname once too - the Fire Island Firefly!
Title: Re: Back to Back
Post by: Flood on 02/04/10, 07:10:17 PM
Quote from: CenterSquare on 02/04/10, 07:04:38 PM
I know they call him the Muscles from Brussels, and I can see why. I had a nickname once too - the Fire Island Firefly!

lol
Title: Re: Back to Back
Post by: Darky on 02/05/10, 11:38:20 AM
(http://www.abdcards.com/pins/nfl-pins/nfl00118.jpg)
Title: Re: Back to Back
Post by: Flood on 02/05/10, 03:11:52 PM
good post
Title: Re: Back to Back
Post by: nomaaa on 02/06/10, 06:57:09 AM
darky's on fire in this thread
Title: Re: Back to Back
Post by: Reds on 02/28/10, 10:05:17 PM
3 in a row.  4 out of 5.
Title: Re: Back to Back
Post by: ultimate7 on 03/01/10, 02:35:48 PM
Barely, good thing someone was paying attention late yesterday
Title: Re: Back to Back
Post by: ultimate7 on 03/06/10, 07:27:47 PM
The steak is gonna end this month unless we really pick it up
Title: Re: Back to Back
Post by: fathedX on 03/06/10, 08:06:38 PM
March hasn't matched February since 2004.  With the improving weather, there's no way the steak continues.  Aw well, it was fun while it lasted.
Title: Re: Back to Back
Post by: TβG on 03/07/10, 12:03:33 AM
what's the latest vegetarian count around here these days?  i doubt the steak continues.
Title: Re: Back to Back
Post by: fathedX on 04/06/10, 10:30:13 AM
March was a disaster, not even 60% of February.  April has to pick it up.
Title: Re: Back to Back
Post by: Barton on 04/06/10, 10:31:54 AM
Well, in our defense, February was a shorter month.
Title: Re: Back to Back
Post by: Big Hath on 04/06/10, 10:45:22 AM
doesn't that make March an even worse disaster?
Title: Re: Back to Back
Post by: Gantry on 04/06/10, 10:46:14 AM
I'm blaming each and every one of you for March's output.  April better exceed February levels or I start putting banner ads on the site
Title: Re: Back to Back
Post by: Reds on 04/06/10, 10:55:11 AM
Fuck you
Title: Re: Back to Back
Post by: Gantry on 04/06/10, 10:59:39 AM
Take the rest of the week off, Jimmy
Title: Re: Back to Back
Post by: BeefMaster on 04/06/10, 11:02:20 AM
I would be interested in seeing the type of banner ads that the Dee-Nee forums would attract.
Title: Re: Back to Back
Post by: Reds on 04/06/10, 11:03:57 AM
Quote from: Gantry on 04/06/10, 10:59:39 AM
Take the rest of the week off, Jimmy

How you gonna get a high post count with that attitude?
Title: Re: Back to Back
Post by: Barton on 04/06/10, 11:04:48 AM
Quote from: Big Hath on 04/06/10, 10:45:22 AM
doesn't that make March an even worse disaster?
Nope.
Title: Re: Back to Back
Post by: Gantry on 04/06/10, 11:06:24 AM
Quote from: Reds on 04/06/10, 11:03:57 AM
Quote from: Gantry on 04/06/10, 10:59:39 AM
Take the rest of the week off, Jimmy

How you gonna get a high post count with that attitude?

I delete all your posts for housekeeping/sanity purposes every 1st of the month, so there should be minimal change
Title: Re: Back to Back
Post by: Big Hath on 04/06/10, 11:12:58 AM
Quote from: Barton on 04/06/10, 11:04:48 AM
Quote from: Big Hath on 04/06/10, 10:45:22 AM
doesn't that make March an even worse disaster?
Nope.

what logic are you using?
Title: Re: Back to Back
Post by: Barton on 04/06/10, 11:13:57 AM
Quote from: Big Hath on 04/06/10, 11:12:58 AM
Quote from: Barton on 04/06/10, 11:04:48 AM
Quote from: Big Hath on 04/06/10, 10:45:22 AM
doesn't that make March an even worse disaster?
Nope.

what logic are you using?
Incorrect logic. Just completely facetious.
Title: Re: Back to Back
Post by: Big Hath on 04/06/10, 11:22:04 AM
Quote from: Barton on 04/06/10, 11:13:57 AM
Incorrect logic. Just completely Gantry's facetious. is teh worst.  THE WORST.
Title: Re: Back to Back
Post by: BeefMaster on 04/06/10, 11:44:31 AM
Quote from: Big Hath on 04/06/10, 11:22:04 AM
Quote from: Barton on 04/06/10, 11:13:57 AM
Incorrect logic. Just completely Gantry's facetious. is teh worst.  THE WORST.

Kind of a stretch imo.
Title: Re: Back to Back
Post by: fightonusc on 04/06/10, 02:36:36 PM
We should place a Facebook ad for Dee-Nee. I spent $10 for an ad for my Sprint Car group on Facebook and went from less than 100 fans to almost 800 within a week.
Title: Re: Back to Back
Post by: TβG on 04/06/10, 11:30:12 PM
why don't you go ahead and spring for that ten-spot, there, richie rich.
Title: Re: Back to Back
Post by: Gantry on 04/07/10, 02:02:29 PM
Post more you fucks
Title: Re: Back to Back
Post by: GDavis on 04/07/10, 02:16:18 PM
Quote from: Gantry on 04/07/10, 02:02:29 PM
Post moore you fucks

(http://assets.mog.com/pictures/wikipedia/46208/396px-Dudley_Moore.jpg)
Title: Re: Back to Back
Post by: fightonusc on 04/07/10, 03:14:47 PM
(http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/dinty%20moore.jpg)
Title: Re: Back to Back
Post by: BeefMaster on 04/07/10, 03:20:21 PM
(http://images.halosheaven.com/images/admin/donnie_moore.jpg)
Title: Re: Back to Back
Post by: Barton on 04/07/10, 03:27:54 PM
Quote from: Gantry on 04/07/10, 02:02:29 PM
Post moor you fucks

Title: Re: Back to Back
Post by: fightonusc on 04/07/10, 03:28:34 PM
(http://jakemcmillan.files.wordpress.com/2009/10/roger-moore-james-bond-c10102109-thumb-385x477.jpg)
Title: Re: Back to Back
Post by: BeefMaster on 04/07/10, 03:30:40 PM
Quote from: Gantry on 04/07/10, 02:02:29 PM
Post moray you fucks

(http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/a/a1/Gymnothorax_fimbriatus.JPG/450px-Gymnothorax_fimbriatus.JPG)
Title: Re: Back to Back
Post by: BeefMaster on 04/07/10, 03:31:52 PM
Quote from: Gantry on 04/07/10, 02:02:29 PM
Post mower you fucks

(http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/8/81/ReelMower.png/678px-ReelMower.png)
Title: Re: Back to Back
Post by: Gerlost on 04/07/10, 03:59:21 PM
(http://product.images.fansedge.com/33-50/33-50723-F.jpg)
Title: Re: Back to Back
Post by: fightonusc on 04/07/10, 04:06:09 PM
Quote from: Gantry on 04/07/10, 02:02:29 PM
Post mowatt you fucks
Title: Re: Back to Back
Post by: Gerlost on 04/07/10, 04:06:51 PM
Quote from: Gantry on 04/07/10, 02:02:29 PM
Post morn you fucks

(http://www.rankopedia.com/CandidatePix/9680.gif)
Title: Re: Back to Back
Post by: Big Hath on 04/07/10, 04:11:15 PM
.
Title: Re: Back to Back
Post by: Gerlost on 04/07/10, 04:12:11 PM
Quote from: Gantry on 04/07/10, 02:02:29 PM
Post-punk you fucks

(http://gothstore.piratemerch.com/images/joy-division.jpg)
Title: Re: Back to Back
Post by: BDawk on 04/07/10, 04:16:31 PM
Quote from: Gantry on 04/07/10, 02:02:29 PM
Post route you fucks

(http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/4/42/Post_route.png/275px-Post_route.png)
Title: Re: Back to Back
Post by: Gerlost on 04/07/10, 04:17:51 PM
Nacho really likes the one on the left.
Title: Re: Back to Back
Post by: Gantry on 04/07/10, 07:59:29 PM
You guys are getting better...
Title: Re: Back to Back
Post by: Gantry on 04/09/10, 09:42:54 AM
I lied - the numbers aren't there and you are all a bunch of worthless fucks.  Set in your ways, making the same played out jokes and having more babies in your pathetic lives.  The stagnation of this board sickens me - start new topics, talk about something different, ask questions about things you don't know about, go somewhere besides the movies or TGI Fridays with your wives tonight, DO SOMETHING!
Title: Re: Back to Back
Post by: Mike D. on 04/09/10, 09:45:01 AM
I think Gantry has enlisted the services of the spammers to boost board participation.
Title: Re: Back to Back
Post by: Gantry on 04/09/10, 09:52:22 AM
They certainly add more to the discussion than your old, boring ass talking about fishing and taxes.    We need a MikeD intervention, I'm thinking the July 4th party may be the proper time for that
Title: Re: Back to Back
Post by: Gantry on 04/09/10, 11:38:29 AM
Quote from: Gantry on 04/09/10, 09:42:54 AM
I lied - the numbers aren't there and you are all a bunch of worthless fucks.  Set in your ways, making the same played out jokes and having more babies in your pathetic lives.  The stagnation of this board sickens me - start new topics, talk about something different, ask questions about things you don't know about, go somewhere besides the movies or TGI Fridays with your wives tonight, DO SOMETHING!

Good redemption this morning, Dee-Nee.  Sometimes as coach you have to get yourself kicked out of the game to fire up the troops.  Mission accomplished
Title: Re: Back to Back
Post by: Reds on 06/18/10, 10:50:04 AM
Decent chance we hit 10k this month.
Title: Re: Back to Back
Post by: GDavis on 06/18/10, 12:31:28 PM
Quote from: Gerlost on 04/07/10, 04:06:51 PM
Quote from: Gantry on 04/07/10, 02:02:29 PM
Post morn you fucks

(http://www.rankopedia.com/CandidatePix/9680.gif)

As a big DS9 dork I appreciated this one
Title: Re: Back to Back
Post by: fightonusc on 06/18/10, 12:57:51 PM
Quote from: GDavis on 06/18/10, 12:31:28 PM
Quote from: Gerlost on 04/07/10, 04:06:51 PM
Quote from: Gantry on 04/07/10, 02:02:29 PM
Post morn you fucks

(http://www.rankopedia.com/CandidatePix/9680.gif)

As a big DS9 dork I appreciated this one

I'm shocked that you are into shitty science fiction.
Title: Re: Back to Back
Post by: GDavis on 06/18/10, 01:51:59 PM
Blatant baiting.  Not worthy of a response imo.
Title: Re: Back to Back
Post by: Gantry on 06/18/10, 02:09:03 PM
Everyone knows DS9 was a HUGE step below original and TNG, everyone...
Title: Re: Back to Back
Post by: GDavis on 06/18/10, 02:14:56 PM
Quote from: Gantry on 06/18/10, 02:09:03 PM
Everyone knows DS9 was a HUGE step below original and TNG, everyone...

From season 4 on, it's the best that the Star Trek franchise has ever produced.
Title: Re: Back to Back
Post by: Gantry on 06/18/10, 02:16:20 PM
WOW!
Title: Re: Back to Back
Post by: GDavis on 06/18/10, 02:17:40 PM
not even debatable imo
Title: Re: Back to Back
Post by: Gantry on 06/18/10, 02:19:21 PM
This is fkn crazy talk, almost to the point where I may have to start watching it again.  Can I jump right into season 4 or would I need to watch the first 3 to know what is going on? 

Title: Re: Back to Back
Post by: GDavis on 06/18/10, 02:25:18 PM
Quote from: Gantry on 06/18/10, 02:19:21 PM
This is fkn crazy talk, almost to the point where I may have to start watching it again.  Can I jump right into season 4 or would I need to watch the first 3 to know what is going on? 

First 3 are garbage, which is probably why you think the show sucks.  I think you can start with 4 and pick things up fine.

Written by the same guy that did Battlestar Galactica so I'm a bit confused as to why Manfreddy would be ripping it.
Title: Re: Back to Back
Post by: Gantry on 06/18/10, 02:27:52 PM
I think your claim is absolutely ludicrous but I'm willing to give it another shot.  Is it even on regular TV anymore?  SyFy?
Title: Re: Back to Back
Post by: GDavis on 06/18/10, 02:30:11 PM
Quote from: Gantry on 06/18/10, 02:27:52 PM
I think your claim is absolutely ludicrous but I'm willing to give it another shot.  Is it even on regular TV anymore?  SyFy?

No.  Netflix
Title: Re: Back to Back
Post by: GDavis on 06/18/10, 02:31:28 PM
It's not like TNG was an amazing show either.  It had some good episodes and a lot of shit ones.  DS9 has a few shit episodes here and there but is overall far better than TNG.
Title: Re: Back to Back
Post by: Gantry on 06/18/10, 02:34:42 PM
I agree with that on TNG, there were some turds.  The original was the best, not even close....
Title: Re: Back to Back
Post by: fknmclane on 06/18/10, 04:01:18 PM
(http://noq.ccrepair.net/images/motivators/nerds.jpg)
Title: Re: Back to Back
Post by: GDavis on 06/19/10, 10:29:32 PM
Quote from: GDavis on 06/18/10, 02:25:18 PM
Written by the same guy that did Battlestar Galactica so I'm a bit confused as to why Manfreddy would be ripping it.

No reply?  owned imo
Title: Re: Back to Back
Post by: Flood on 06/21/10, 03:41:13 PM
Quote from: fknmclane on 06/18/10, 04:01:18 PM
(http://noq.ccrepair.net/images/motivators/nerds.jpg)

:POW:
Title: Re: Back to Back
Post by: fightonusc on 06/21/10, 08:38:50 PM
Quote from: GDavis on 06/19/10, 10:29:32 PM
Quote from: GDavis on 06/18/10, 02:25:18 PM
Written by the same guy that did Battlestar Galactica so I'm a bit confused as to why Manfreddy would be ripping it.

No reply?  owned imo

Rather, I feel like comparing one of the greatest shows in recent memory (BSG) with a total turd (DS9) hardly deserved a response.

Next you'll be recommending that fans of "Mad Men" watch "Two and a Half Men"
Title: Re: Back to Back
Post by: GDavis on 06/21/10, 10:19:02 PM
Sound reasoning imo.  Charlie Sheen wears some wacky shirts in that show.
Title: Re: Back to Back
Post by: GDavis on 06/22/10, 09:37:01 AM
(http://blurredproductions.files.wordpress.com/2009/03/sisko-facepalm.jpg)
Title: Re: Back to Back
Post by: Gantry on 06/22/10, 11:37:31 AM
Getting tense...
Title: Re: Back to Back
Post by: TβG on 06/22/10, 05:46:53 PM
i thought this thread would be about the lakers' recent championships...