News:

RIP GoReds

Main Menu

Superstars or Role Players

Started by TommyD (MrOJ), 05/26/05, 03:19:47 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

What kind of lineup would you preffer for RBI?

Two or three superstars with average-below supporting.
4 (40%)
Eight players all above average, but nothing great.
6 (60%)

Total Members Voted: 8

TommyD (MrOJ)

I'd definately choose the two superstars.. in RBI Baseball, superstars can take you a long way, like hit 3 HRs each in a game, producing 7-8 runs ;)
QuoteThat's not Yankee dancing - that's Devil Rays dancin'!

Quote from: fightonusc
I'm going to take your NES controller and jam it so far up your ass that you'll need to learn how to work the 'A' button with your small intestine.

ultimate7

This is a good question, probably should be in the RBI forum, for me it really depends on what kind of average guy you are talking about.

Having 3 Eric Davis's in your lineup though is pretty tough to argue against
Quote from: Dårky on 11/02/10, 12:04:50 AM
The Raiders are a successful organization

Stock

I went with consistency.  Yes, a couple superstars are nice since they can get that need bomb, but I think having several holes in your line-up is even worse.
This is my biggest problem w/ NY.  I would consider Herndz thru Straw to be "2-3" superstars, but they have too many holes in their line-up to make them a great team.
If I were playing against someone, I would rather only have 2-3 studs to face (or pitch around), and then not have to worry about the next 6 spots. This is much better than pitching to a team of just above average guys (say Pucket).
Quote from: Gantry on 07/27/12, 12:39:03 PM
I said it once and I'll say it again - stock is smart

JoeDirt

I agree with stock and submit Min as another example of why consistency throughout the line up is better than a few studs.  It's just too easy to pitch around the studs and make the weak hitters beat you.
Quote from: BDawk on 10/10/07, 08:16:42 AM
The dee nee tard mixed in with gantry looks a little bit like TBT

ultimate7

This is why you have to define average.  If you are saying that Kevin Mitchell is average, yes I'd prefer a lineup of Mitchells to 3 EDs and 5 Gladdens.
Quote from: Dårky on 11/02/10, 12:04:50 AM
The Raiders are a successful organization

Stock

Quote from: ultimate7 on 05/26/05, 03:56:08 PM
This is why you have to define average.  If you are saying that Kevin Mitchell is average, yes I'd prefer a lineup of Mitchells to 3 EDs and 5 Gladdens.

Right.  And he even said "above average".  I figured Pucket fit this description pretty well since I could think of 45-50 players better than him in the game.
Quote from: Gantry on 07/27/12, 12:39:03 PM
I said it once and I'll say it again - stock is smart

MR RBI

I love my New York Mets line-up. I find putting in Heep is a great move for me in the line-up Stock. How bout you? 

Stock

Quote from: MR RBI on 05/26/05, 07:08:02 PM
I love my New York Mets line-up. I find putting in Heep is a great move for me in the line-up Stock. How bout you? 

Here is the line-up I usually use for NY:
Dykstr
Johnsn
Herndz
Carter
Strwby
Teufel
Knight
Heep
Quote from: Gantry on 07/27/12, 12:39:03 PM
I said it once and I'll say it again - stock is smart

MR RBI

No Wilson..Wow.You lose his speed and gain a bat.Nice move. I can't do that..I believe in hit and run.Hojo don't even hit the long ball.

Stock

Quote from: MR RBI on 05/26/05, 07:44:38 PM
No Wilson..Wow.You lose his speed and gain a bat.Nice move. I can't do that..I believe in hit and run.Hojo don't even hit the long ball.

On a personal note, I think HoJo is better than Dykstra and Wilson, but I leave in Dykstra for his speed.  As for subbing out Wilson, Hojo has much more power (same as Brenly), and still has above average speed.  I just feel that HoJo AND Heep need to be in that order somewhere.
Quote from: Gantry on 07/27/12, 12:39:03 PM
I said it once and I'll say it again - stock is smart

MR RBI

Joe Dirt beat me with our Mets today 1-0. But i beat his Giants 1-0.......