News:

RIP GoReds

Main Menu

Finishing what Tengen started...

Started by Turd, 01/30/10, 06:00:34 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Clambutt

what is the speed cap?  do i re-rated EDavis or just use his NL ratings from RBI?
"Chubbs finger-banged a pregnant stripper at a booth in a strip club once and his hand didn't fall off so yeah, I'd probably eat stripper pussy." - fknmclane

Gantry

Otis Nixon was a sub on the Indians and I gave him 148, same as Coleman.  He had an ABSURD 23 steals in 110 plate appearances in 1986, almost warrants at 150. 

I'd say use the RBI ratings already given...

Clambutt

Kal Daniels had a monster year in '87.  .334  26HR, 26SB in 108 games...
"Chubbs finger-banged a pregnant stripper at a booth in a strip club once and his hand didn't fall off so yeah, I'd probably eat stripper pussy." - fknmclane

Turd

For speed cap, I'd say there isn't one. Use the original as a guide.

For all-star ratings, I'd say use the ones they gave for consistency's sake

Gantry

Jesus, that's worthy of 900+ power AND 140 speed

Clambutt

Quote from: Gantry on 02/01/10, 03:23:57 PM
Jesus, that's worthy of 900+ power AND 140 speed
I went 890 & 138
"Chubbs finger-banged a pregnant stripper at a booth in a strip club once and his hand didn't fall off so yeah, I'd probably eat stripper pussy." - fknmclane

Gantry

I say go higher for the power - his SLG was 20 points higher than anyone in the NL that year, though he didn't qualify based on ABs.  Plenty of 900+ power guys of the orignial 10, I think those stats are worth it. 

I gave Joe Carter 909 and 138 for his .302/29HRs/29 steals in 1986

BeefMaster

Quote from: tecmoturd on 02/01/10, 03:23:52 PM
For all-star ratings, I'd say use the ones they gave for consistency's sake

I'd assume this only applies if it's an '87 team.
"Nobody in football should be called a genius. A genius is a guy like Norman Einstein." - Joe Theismann

Turd

Good point, Beef...I am not sure how I feel about this...

Same guy on the ROM twice with different stats from different years
A guy on the 86 team with his 87 stats because the all-star team has him rated already (or vice versa)

TbT

Quote from: Clambutt on 02/01/10, 03:19:56 PM
Kal Daniels had a monster year in '87.  .334  26HR, 26SB in 108 games...

Great job by the Cubs when they got his washed up ass.   >:(
Visit:  http://www.tecmobowl-vs-rbi.com/index.html ---strategy, info, and player ratings for Tecmo Bowl & R.B.I. Baseball.

Turd

Man, I'm torn about this...Tengen gave Molitor 744 for power, even though he hit .353 that year...if Gantry is correct that 768 is a good generic mediocre power rating, that's awfully low for Molitor in my opinion.

What do you guys think, in these situations, do we ignore the ratings from the all-star teams and rate as we think they should be rated?

Clambutt

"Chubbs finger-banged a pregnant stripper at a booth in a strip club once and his hand didn't fall off so yeah, I'd probably eat stripper pussy." - fknmclane

Turd

Thanks for clearing that up Clam! Which one is it?

Clambutt

Molitor should prolly have better power than Pettis; so...
"Chubbs finger-banged a pregnant stripper at a booth in a strip club once and his hand didn't fall off so yeah, I'd probably eat stripper pussy." - fknmclane

Gantry

I have no qualms with saying screw you to the stats from the AS teams....

Turd

awesome, after seeing a good example, I'm of the same philosophy, Gantry.

TβG

i'm using 1987 for the dodgers. 
question:  bob welch had a superior year to fernando, and since fernando is already in the game as an all-star, i should favor welch on the dodgers roster, right?
Quote from: Nacho on 03/15/16, 10:17:08 AMWe've had babe drafts. We've had a sandwich draft. We can have our babes and eat sandwiches, too.

Gantry


TβG

how are we rating player's running speed?
Quote from: Nacho on 03/15/16, 10:17:08 AMWe've had babe drafts. We've had a sandwich draft. We can have our babes and eat sandwiches, too.

Gantry

I'm just loosely basing it off stolen bases, CS, triples and plate appearances.  Nothing scientific at all...